Select the search type
  • Site
  • Web
Search

Learning Path

AI on a Development Team

Who it’s for: Developers, testers, and tech leads who want practical, sprint-ready ways to use AI to build faster without sacrificing quality.

Outcomes

  • Use AI to turn vague work into clear, testable stories and acceptance criteria the team can build from.
  • Accelerate coding with guardrails: prompts that reinforce TDD, code review quality, and consistent patterns.
  • Improve delivery reliability by using AI for risk surfacing, edge cases, and “definition of done” readiness checks.

Path Steps

Work through these steps in order. Each one links to a specific EasyDNNnews article/video post.

8 steps
1
Step 1: How AI fits into a dev team (without chaos)

You’ll learn where AI helps most (planning, building, testing, reviewing) and how to keep the team in control.

Do this List 3 recurring “time sinks” in your sprint and pick one to target with AI assistance first.
5
Step 5: Code generation with guardrails

You’ll learn how to constrain AI output to your architecture, conventions, and security requirements.

Do this Create a “project rules” snippet (stack, patterns, naming, linting) and reuse it in every coding prompt.
7
Step 7: Test data, mocking, and troubleshooting with AI

You’ll learn how to generate realistic test data and isolate failures faster with structured debugging prompts.

Do this Paste a failing test + stack trace and ask AI for the top 3 hypotheses with “how to prove/kill each.”

Steps - Free

Steps - Members

 
 
✓ Featured Content

AI Coding Videos

A curated playlist of specific YouTube content.

Search Results

24 Feb 2026

Step 1: Set Up Your AI-Assisted Workflow

Author: Rod Claar  /  Categories: AI for Experienced Devs Learning Path  /  Rate this article:
No rating

1.1 Define the “contract” for AI use

Treat AI like a service with a clear interface.

  • Allowed work (good fits)

    • Drafting code scaffolds and tests

    • Refactoring suggestions

    • Generating acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test data

    • Explaining unfamiliar code paths

  • Disallowed work (requires human ownership)

    • Final security decisions

    • Anything involving secrets, keys, customer data

    • Unreviewed direct commits to main

Deliverable: a short “AI Use Policy” section in your repo README or engineering handbook.

1.2 Create a standard prompt structure (your “prompt template”)

Use the same headings every time so outputs are predictable and comparable.

Prompt Template

  1. Goal: what you want (single sentence)

  2. Context: relevant code/design constraints, definitions, domain rules

  3. Inputs: files/snippets/data (only what’s needed)

  4. Constraints: libraries, style guides, performance/security requirements

  5. Output format: exact structure (diff, checklist, test plan, ADR, etc.)

  6. Quality bar: tests required, linting, complexity limits, edge cases

  7. Assumptions & questions: what to do if information is missing

Guardrail rule: If missing info prevents correctness, the AI must list assumptions explicitly instead of guessing.

 

1.3 Add “reviewability” guardrails

Make every response easy to inspect.

Require the AI to produce:

  • A small, bounded change set (no “rewrite everything”)

  • Rationale per change (1–2 lines each)

  • Risk notes (what might break)

  • Test impact (new/updated tests, how to run)

  • Checklist for reviewers

Example output formats

  • “Provide a unified diff”

  • “Return a PR description: Summary / Changes / Tests / Risks”

  • “Return an acceptance test plan in Gherkin”

  • “Return a table: Edge case | Expected behavior | Test approach”

1.4 Integrate into the normal dev flow (PR-first)

Keep AI outputs inside the same governance you already trust.

Recommended workflow:

  1. Create a branch (human-owned)

  2. Use AI to draft code/tests/docs

  3. Run tests and linters locally

  4. Open PR with AI-generated summary + your review notes

  5. CI gates + human review

  6. Merge

Key principle: AI can propose; humans approve.

1.5 Build your “context pack” (reusable, minimal)

A context pack is the small set of material you feed repeatedly.

Include:

  • Architecture summary (1 page)

  • Coding standards (lint rules, formatting)

  • Domain glossary (terms, invariants)

  • Test conventions (naming, fixtures, patterns)

  • Security constraints (red lines)

Keep it short enough to paste or reference reliably.

1.6 Step completion checklist

You’re done with Step 1 when you have:

  • A written AI use policy (what’s allowed/not allowed)

  • A prompt template used by the team

  • Standard output formats (diff, PR summary, test plan)

  • A PR-first integration workflow

  • A reusable context pack


Step 1 “artifact” you can reuse (copy/paste)

Definition of Done for AI outputs

  • Must list assumptions explicitly

  • Must provide bounded changes (no unscoped rewrites)

  • Must include rationale + risks

  • Must include tests and how to run them

  • Must be suitable for PR review

 

 

 

Print

Number of views (53)      Comments (0)

Tags:

Search

Calendar

«March 2026»
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
22232425262728
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930311234

Upcoming events

Upcoming Training

20 May 2026

Author: Rod Claar
0 Comments
Article rating: No rating

2 Apr 2026

Author: Rod Claar
0 Comments
Article rating: No rating

5 Mar 2026

Author: Rod Claar
0 Comments
Article rating: No rating

2 Feb 2026

0 Comments
Article rating: No rating

10 Nov 2025

Author: Rod Claar
0 Comments
Article rating: No rating
RSS

Keep Going

Choose the free path for fresh lessons—or go deeper with the full course when you’re ready.

Free

Join updates / get new lessons

Get short, practical AI-on-a-dev-team tips, new step releases, and ready-to-use prompts—delivered as they’re published.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.