Select the search type
  • Site
  • Web
Search

Path Steps

Follow these steps in order. Each one links to an EasyDNNnews article/video and gives you a quick, practical takeaway.

You’ll learn how to frame AI as a teammate that supports Scrum events and backlog work without replacing judgment or collaboration.
Do this exercise: Write a 3-sentence “AI usage policy” for your team (what you will use AI for, what you won’t, and what must be reviewed by a human).
You’ll learn repeatable prompt patterns to generate stories with clearer intent, constraints, and acceptance criteria.
Do this exercise: Take one messy request and prompt AI to produce (a) a user story, (b) 5 acceptance criteria, and (c) 3 key questions for the PO.
You’ll learn how to generate “plan options” (not commitments) and improve shared understanding of scope and dependencies.
Do this exercise: Ask AI for 2 sprint goal options based on your top backlog items, then pick one as a team and adjust wording together.
You’ll learn facilitation prompts that help teams extract insights, turn feedback into actions, and avoid “retro theatre.”
Do this exercise: Feed AI 5 bullet facts from the sprint and ask for (a) patterns, (b) 3 improvement experiments, and (c) 1 metric per experiment.
You’ll learn how to convert your best prompts and practices into a lightweight working agreement the team can actually follow.
Do this exercise: Create a “Prompt Library” page with 5 prompts: refinement, story writing, planning, review, retro—each with input/output examples.
 

Learning Path - Free

24 Feb 2026

Step 1: What AI Can (and Can’t) Do for Scrum Teams

AI is a productivity amplifier—not a Product Owner, not a Scrum Master, and not a Developer.

Used correctly, it accelerates learning, drafting, summarizing, and exploring options. Used poorly, it replaces thinking with automation theater.

This step helps your team position AI as a supporting teammate, not a decision-maker.

Author: Rod Claar
0 Comments
Article rating: No rating

24 Feb 2026

Step 2: Prompts That Produce Better User Stories

AI can help—but only if the prompt is structured.

This step introduces repeatable prompt patterns that improve:

  • Intent clarity

  • Constraints visibility

  • Acceptance criteria quality

  • PO alignment

Author: Rod Claar
0 Comments
Article rating: No rating

24 Feb 2026

Step 3: Backlog Refinement with AI (Without Losing the “Why”)

The Core Risk

When teams use AI in refinement, a common failure mode appears:

  • Stories get cleaner

  • Acceptance criteria get longer

  • Technical detail increases

  • Business intent becomes less visible

Scrum optimizes for value delivery, not documentation density.

AI must support the “why” behind the work.

Author: Rod Claar
0 Comments
Article rating: No rating

24 Feb 2026

Step 4: Sprint Planning Acceleration

The Key Principle

AI should propose:

  • Possible Sprint Goals

  • Possible scope groupings

  • Possible dependency flags

The team still decides:

  • What to commit to

  • What fits capacity

  • What aligns to product strategy

AI drafts.
The team commits.

Author: Rod Claar
0 Comments
Article rating: No rating
RSS

Learning Path - Member

 
 
✓ Featured Content

AI for Scrum and Agile Teams
Videos

A curated playlist of specific YouTube content.

Search Results

9 Mar 2026

Step 4: Acceptance Criteria that Actually Test

Author: Rod Claar  /  Categories: AI for Scrum POs Learning Path  /  Rate this article:
No rating

Step 4: Acceptance Criteria that Actually Test

Objective

Acceptance criteria frequently fail for one simple reason: they are not verifiable.

Common problems include:

  • vague language (“works correctly”, “loads quickly”)

  • missing edge cases

  • unclear failure conditions

  • criteria that cannot be objectively tested

AI can help Product Owners generate clear, testable acceptance criteria that support development and acceptance testing.


Core Skill

Writing Verifiable Acceptance Criteria

Strong acceptance criteria share three properties:

Property Meaning
Specific Describes observable system behavior
Testable Can be objectively verified
Complete Covers normal use, edge cases, and failures

Instead of writing vague expectations, Product Owners should define observable outcomes.

Weak example

The report should load quickly.

Better example

The report loads within 3 seconds for datasets under 5,000 rows.

The second statement can be measured and verified.


Prompt Pattern for Acceptance Tests

Use a structured prompt to produce balanced test coverage.


 

You are assisting a Product Owner writing acceptance tests.

Given the following user story, produce six acceptance tests:

• 2 happy path scenarios
• 2 edge case scenarios
• 2 negative or failure scenarios

Write them in clear, verifiable language so they can be tested objectively.

User Story:
[Paste story here]

This structure forces AI to generate complete test thinking, not just optimistic scenarios.


Exercise (Hands-On)

DO THIS EXERCISE

Select one user story from your backlog.

Then use this prompt:


 

You are assisting a Product Owner improving acceptance criteria.

Generate six acceptance tests for the following user story:

• 2 happy path tests
• 2 edge case tests
• 2 negative tests

Each test must describe observable system behavior.

User Story:
[Paste story here]

After the AI produces the tests:

Remove anything that cannot be objectively verified.

If a test cannot be measured or observed, rewrite it until it can.


Example

User Story

As a product manager
I want to export analytics data to CSV
So that I can analyze it in external tools.


Happy Path Tests

  1. User exports dashboard data and receives a downloadable CSV file within 5 seconds.

  2. Exported CSV contains all visible dashboard metrics and column headers.


Edge Case Tests

  1. Export works when the dashboard contains exactly one row of data.

  2. Export succeeds when filters are applied to the dashboard.


Negative Tests

  1. Export attempt without analytics permission returns an authorization error.

  2. Export fails gracefully if the dataset exceeds the system size limit.


Why This Matters for Product Owners

Clear acceptance criteria improve:

  • shared understanding between Product Owner and developers

  • testability of user stories

  • speed of acceptance during sprint review

  • confidence in delivered functionality

When acceptance tests are concrete and verifiable, teams spend less time debating intent and more time delivering value.


Practical Tip

Before sprint planning, review acceptance criteria and ask:

“Could a tester objectively prove this passed or failed?”

If the answer is unclear, the criteria need refinement.

Print

Number of views (18)      Comments (0)

Tags:

Search

Calendar

«March 2026»
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
22232425262728
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930311234

Upcoming events

Upcoming AI Training

20 May 2026

Author: Rod Claar
0 Comments
Article rating: No rating

2 Apr 2026

Author: Rod Claar
0 Comments
Article rating: No rating
RSS

Two Ways

Keep Learning — Two Ways

Choose the free track to get new lessons as they’re released, or go deeper with a structured course that puts everything into a repeatable playbook.

Free
Join updates / get new lessons

Get notified when new steps, templates, and examples are added—so you can keep improving your AI skills one sprint at a time.

Join updates
No spam. Practical lessons only. Unsubscribe any time.